Since I have a hard time typing, I thought I would share this with you. I'm on the EWG email list and received this today, it has some great info- see below:
Your BPA questions, answered
When we posted a little analysis of the new research on the toxic plastics chemical bisphenol A (BPA) leaching from polycarbonate bottles, we had no idea how many questions it would inspire. This month, instead of the usual Ask EWG feature, we've put together a post in which we answer as many of your BPA questions as we can. We know you've probably got even more questions. Ask away and we'll do our best to answer, but keep in mind that there are some questions we just don't have the answers to yet.
First, a little review: What is BPA?
BPA is a chemical used in the production of certain kinds of plastics, including polycarbonate plastic (like hard, colored water bottles and 5-gallon drinking water coolers) and the lining of most food and beverage cans. BPA can leach from the plastic and into foods and beverages, especially when it's heated or used for long periods of time. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control found BPA in the bodies of 93 percent of the people they tested, which is especially troubling since the chemical is linked to breast and prostate cancer and neurobehavioral changes in offspring exposed in the womb. It's a good idea to avoid exposure to BPA whenever possible.
Stuff you drink out of
Polycarbonate bottles: As the original post mentioned, studies show low levels of BPA leach out of polycarbonate bottles (like Nalgene and other hard, colored water bottles) at room temperature. More BPA leaches when the bottles are filled with hot liquid. Generally these bottles will be marked with recycling number seven. Polycarbonate is hard, translucent or clear plastic.These bottles may be marked with the number 7. If you're going to use a polycarbonate bottle, be aware that it's likely that higher amounts of BPA leach out of older and damaged bottles. Although we recommend that you avoid drinking from polycarbonate bottles, it's important to note that your potential exposure to BPA through canned food is considerably higher.
One commenter mentioned recycling; as far as we know, #7 drink bottles are rarely recyclable. To be sure, check with your local recycling center.
Other plastic bottles: Don't reuse single-use plastic drink bottles (PET, or #1 plastic). It's a good instinct, but bacteria can build up on the inside, and they may leach chemicals too. Drop them in the recycling instead. Bottles made from flexible, cloudy-colored HDPE #2 are considered a safer option if you must have a plastic bottle.
Water filter pitchers and containers: These hard, clear plastic containers may or may not be made of polycarbonate. One commenter left a link to a Q&A on The Green Guide which reveals that Brita filter systems use containers made from styrene methylmethacrylate copolymer. Brita confirmed for us that they don't use (and never have used) polycarbonate plastics. Other filter brands may use polycarbonate plastics; check with them to find out. If your filter does use polycarbonate plastic, you could consider filtering water and storing it in glass bottles.
Camelbak hydration systems: Camelbaks's inner bladder is made from flexible polyurethane, which contains no BPA or phthalates. They have an antimicrobial silver lining. There's no risk of BPA exposure, but some scientists have raised concerns about antimicrobial silver.
Metal water bottles: Metal water bottles come in two variations: stainless steel and aluminum. Many aluminum bottles are lined with an epoxy or enamel, which is likely to contain BPA. Sigg, the Swiss company that produces a line of aluminum water bottles, recently produced test data showing that several new and used Sigg bottles did not leach BPA at levels greater than 2 ppb after three days of heating in nearly boiling water -- that's less leaching than polycarbonate bottles under the same condition. Stainless steel bottles, like Klean Kanteen, are not lined, so there's no risk of BPA exposure there.
Food containers
Canned Foods: No matter what brand you use or where you buy your canned food, the cans are almost certainly lined with an epoxy resin that contains BPA. If they didn't use it, the cans might rust, or you might end up with metal residues in your food. But because of the high temperatures used in the canning process, your potential exposure to BPA from canned food is much higher than your potential exposure from plastic water bottles.
Only one manufacturer that we know of uses non-BPA lining on some of their food cans:
Eden Organic Beans are packed in lead free tin covered steel cans coated with a baked on oleoresinous c-enamel lining that does not contain bisphenol A (BPA). (Oleoresin is a natural mixture of an oil and a resin extracted from various plants, such as pine or balsam fir). These cans cost 13.77 percent more than the industry standard cans that do contain BPA. This costs Eden $300,000 more a year. To our knowledge Eden is the only U.S. company that uses this custom made BPA-free can.
Eden's tomato products are still packaged in cans with a BPA-based lining. Have a look at EWG's report for lots more on BPA in canned foods, including certain canned pastas and soups that contained the most BPA.
Reusable food containers: According to Kathleen's comment, Tupperware has confirmed that their Rock'n'Serve line does contain BPA. Other reusable containers may be made of polycarbonate. If not marked with a number 7, these would be very rigid clear or translucent plastic (not cloudy or flexible like yogurt containers). As an extra precaution, avoid putting hot liquids in these or microwaving them. In general it's best to use safe ceramics or glass containers for microwaving whenever possible.
Plastic wrap: In 1998, it was revealed that some plastic wraps contained chemical plasticizers called phthalates, which can migrate into food. In 2006, the industry group American Chemistry Council reported that phthalates are no longer used in any US plastic wraps. Most plastic wraps are made of LDPE, which has fewer contaminant concerns. Companies aren't required to list what's in their plastic wrap, though, so your best bet is to be cautious: Avoid microwaving plastic wrap (use a paper towel instead), and if you must, make sure it's a microwaveable version. That much, at least, will be listed on the box.
More consumer goods
Products for baby: A few of you expressed concerns about products designed for babies, from bottles to formula to pacifiers. Luckily, we lay out the best choices for many baby products in our guide to baby-safe bottles and feeding. Some basics: Choose bottles made from glass or BPA-free plastic. Use a clear silicone nipple, and if you're feeding formula use a powdered version mixed with unfluoridated water. As for pacifiers, while the hard plastic part may be made of polycarbonate plastic, that part doesn't go in baby's mouth -- so get a version with a silicone nipple, and don't worry too much about the rest.
Dental fillings, dental sealants: These can be BPA-based. If you're concerned, ask your dentist to show you the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for the filling materials and look for bisphenol A or bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE), and bisphenol A-dimethyl acrylate (Bis-DMA). A fourth chemical, bis-glycidyldimethacrylate (Bis-GMA), does not appear to give off BPA during use. Try to avoid having dental work done while pregnant or breastfeeding. Remember that BPA passes through your body quickly.
Mouthguards: One commenter asked if mouthguards made out of polycarbonate plastic would be a concern. Contact the manufacturer directly for more information about the type of plastic your mouthguard is made of. If it is polycarbonate, then there is some potential for BPA leaching.
The science
European safety assessment of BPA: One commenter questioned the validity of the study mentioned in the post, based on a comparison with the European Union's assessment. We'd like to caution against holding the EU up as the paragon of chemical safety; while it's true that they're sometimes more cautious about chemicals than the US, that frankly isn't saying much. In this case, the EU assessment ignored the results of dozens of studies showing very low dose effects of BPA and assumed that rodents are far more sensitive than humans to this chemical--an assumption that is by no means universally endorsed.
Here in the U.S., the National Institute of Health (NIH) is currently trying to reconcile the results of 2 expert panels that came to very different conclusions about the potential harm of low dose BPA exposures. There results are expected some time in 2008.
Is BPA making me sick? Can I be tested? BPA passes very quickly through the body, so testing yourself would only give you a snapshot of the past couple of hours. In general, laboratories do not conduct BPA testing for individuals, and people must be part of a scientific study to be tested. Your best bet is to do what you can to limit your exposure to BPA, and support efforts to require that industrial chemicals are fully tested for safety before they are put in our food and in our homes.
Posted by Amanda at 8:00 AM
Permalink
Filed under Ask EWG, bisphenol A, BPA, plastic, toxics
Email this • Subscribe to this feed • Stumble It! • Add This!
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ewg-list.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/1081
Comments
My inquiry to Trader Joe's regarding their canned goods elicited this response:
"Michael,
We appreciate your inquiry. Our canned goods are lined with a BPA free, food grade enamel.
Thank you for shopping at Trader Joe's,
Amy
Customer Relations"
Are they correct?
I thought that enamel linings did not contain BPA.
Posted by: Mikep | March 13, 2008 12:01 PM
MikeP: Oh they said that, did they?
To our knowledge, BPA is used by virtually every canned food manufacturer. The only possible alternative we've heard of, oleoresinous materials, is considerably more expensive to produce, so virtually no one uses it.
They may be using related chemicals, namely bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE), or bisphenol F (also known by their technical names), which could leach BPA into food.
They may also be using a testing technology that isn't sensitive enough to detect low levels of BPA in their products.
If a company claims that their can linings do not contain BPA, they should be able to tell you what they use instead. If you do respond and ask them for more information, I'd be interested to see what they tell you. We just sent them an email for clarification, and we'll keep you posted on what we find out.
Posted by: Amanda | March 13, 2008 12:45 PM
Amanda,
What does a BPA food-can liner look like? Is it transparent, does it look like white plastic? Is it possible to identify whether a can is lined or not just by opening it up and looking at it?
Thanks,
Maria
Posted by: Maria | March 13, 2008 2:22 PM
Maria- You don't even have to look. As far as we know, with the exception of Eden Organic Beans, all metal food cans are lined with a BPA-based epoxy resin. On top of that, the lining of those cans of beans looks exactly like a BPA-based lining. You'd never be able to tell the difference.
Posted by: Amanda | March 13, 2008 2:58 PM
I asked this question before and have asked it of several organizations, but no answer so far. Is BPA used in the box containers used by Trader Joe's, Whole Foods and many others to store soups and stocks (chicken, vegetable etc.)? These containers typically have a pull tab top on the box. Thank you.
Posted by: Courtney Damkroger | March 13, 2008 3:20 PM
Good question, Courtney. From what we know, those tetrapak containers are made up of six layers of material, including paper, aluminum, and polyethylene. Polyethylene is a relatively benign plastic that doesn't contain BPA.
Posted by: Amanda | March 13, 2008 3:45 PM
I am wondering about the plastic tableware marketed toward kids that contain melamine resin? How safe is it? Thanks :) Sheryl
Posted by: Sheryl | March 13, 2008 4:01 PM
Well, Sheryl, I can tell you that it most likely doesn't contain BPA! That's all I know off the top of my head, but I'll see if I can find any info about it.
Posted by: Amanda | March 13, 2008 4:10 PM
I have a food dehydrator which is made from polycarbonate (the shell; the shelves are coated with teflon). The food isn't in contact with the polycarbonate, but is surrounded by it with low heat temperatures. What's the risk of the food absorbing BPA while in the dehydrator? The operating temperature is typically between 95 - 105 degrees F.
Posted by: Leah | March 13, 2008 4:17 PM
Okay, random question - are there any concerns with BPA in silicone kitchen ware? Or melanine plates/cups? Thanks!!
Posted by: Maureen | March 13, 2008 5:04 PM
Leah- I can't say for sure, since there's no research on the subject, but the fact that the temperatures are relatively low and the food doesn't touch the polycarbonate is a very good sign. If nothing else, your exposure from your dehydrated food is likely considerably less than your exposure from canned food.
Posted by: Amanda | March 13, 2008 5:09 PM
Maureen- Thanks for your question! There shouldn't be any BPA in food or medical grade silicone, period. I believe the same is true about melamine tableware.
Posted by: Amanda | March 13, 2008 5:12 PM
Introduction
You've been dying to try that new shampoo that’s supposed to make your hair thick, lush and shiny. You can’t wait to use that new exfoliating scrub because the label tells you that it’s going to make your skin soft and glowing. You love that new cologne, every time you wear it you get so many compliments on how great you smell!
You love these products and how they make you look and feel, but did it ever occur to you that what you put on your hair or your skin could make you sick? Did you know these products contain chemicals, toxins and hormones that can cause anything from an unsightly rash to learning difficulties to birth defects and even cancer? Even though each product may contain a limited amount of these toxins, please keep in mind, most people use several products each day, from the moment they wake up ( soap, shampoo, conditioner, shave cream, deodorant, toothpaste, hand soap, make up) until they go to bed. After many years of daily use, these toxins accumulate in your body to cause the ailments I've listed above, among many others. If they cause these concerns for adults, just imagine the damage they can do to children who are smaller and weigh less. Although each product you may use may contain a restricted amount of chemicals, hormones and toxins, they can, and many times they do cause a myriad of damage to us all.
Not only are these beauty products toxic for humans, they are toxic to the environment, as well. Many of these products are made with petroleum based ingredients which contributes to global warming. Did you know that if you switch just one bottle of a petroleum based product for a vegetable based product we could save 81,000 barrels of oil in one year. How’s that for incentive to switch?
So now you decide it’s time to go “green”, you go to the health food store and purchase “Organic” or “Natural” products and you no longer have to worry about these concerns….or do you?
I have a favorite website: http://www.safecosmetics.org/, which is an online cosmetics-safety database for consumers, called "Skin Deep". Skin Deep highlights ingredients in beauty products that may pose safety risks in humans. Skin Deep is maintained by the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG). It lists ingredients in over 27,000 products, a small chunk of the personal-care products on the market, considering most of us use 15 or more cosmetic and toiletry products each day. I recently found an online article from the Seattle Times which states "The personal-care products we use contain 10,500 different chemicals, according to the Seattle-based Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition." That's a large amount of chemicals in most of the products offered on America's retail shelves.
I think Skin Deep is a great tool. I encourage you to go onto this site and punch in any of the products you use. Skin Deep will tell you how toxic the product is on a scale of zero to ten, and what concerns these toxins cause. I went to the Natural Products Expo East, this past September and after I came home with my "goodie bag" full of products, I went onto Skin Deep to see how these “Natural” products rated and I was amazed how high some of these products scored on the scale. Just because a product claims to be "natural" or "organic" doesn’t mean there aren’t any toxins, chemicals, hormones or synthetic ingredients lurking among the "natural" goods you just purchsed .
A little bit about myself: My name is Julie and I am a product junkie (cosmetics, hair care and the like). I love beauty products and I love to shop. I'm a very young and immature 40, and I have a wonderful husband and a beautiful four year old daughter. I have been recycling for several years, my favorite home cleaning products are baking soda and vinegar and I try to buy organic foods (most of the time..unless the organic strawberries are $7 a pint). I have been concerned about toxins and hormones in our food for a long time, but just recently became aware of the same concerns in my beloved beauty products. I am concerned about the health of my family and my planet, and I am now obsessed with informing you and your family of the dangers of these seemingly harmless products.
The point of this blog: Now that I am committed to buying the least toxic products, how do I know if these low-toxic or earth friendly products work, how do I know if they're any good? Unfortunately, we have no way of knowing how good or bad these products perform, until we spend our hard earned cash and buy it. With that being said, I thought I would make it easy for everyone and take advantage of my love of shopping. I am going to buy a couple of products per week, try them out for a week or two, then give you my critique about whether I think the product is worth purchasing or if I would not recommend the product to you. I will also keep price in mind, (some of these products are pretty expensive), so I will let you know, even if I like the product, whether I think it’s worth the price. I am going to focus on products that score low (0-2) or moderately low (3-4) on the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics scale. I also hope that you feel comfortable sharing your opinions with me. I have added a space for comments so if you have tried a product that scores low on the Skin Deep/ EWG scale, please share your opinion with me. If you would like me to try a product, let me know what it is and I'll try it. The only thing I ask of you is that you are honest, if you are affiliated with a company, please disclose your affiliation to the company you are reviewing.
Julie
No comments:
Post a Comment